Compare Potential Investment Locations

Remove the guess-work from property investment overseas. Our country comparison tool, is a unique “proprietary algorithm” that let's you visualise a particular country's strengths and weaknesses.

Each market we research and monitor, has various advantages and disadvantages. This invaluable tool will help you determine how a country's strengths and weaknesses could impact upon your final investment strategy.

The algorithm is continually revised and updated. And is a robust and accurate forecast tool on how an investment property, in a given location, is likely to perform.

Combined with our other investment tools, Prime Asset Investments helps you remove the guess-work from property investment. Finally, the relevant knowledge and intelligence at your fingertips to help you realise your property investment goals and reduce your risks.

Rank by: Overall investment potential Size Percentage of population under 25 Population growth Interest rates Gross domestic product growth Unemployment rate Inflation rate Wage growth rate Foreign direct investment per capita Number of universities per capita Population density Maximum attainable yield Yield spread Yield data strength Average attainable yield Entry level to market GDP PPP per capita Population below poverty line Income distribution Industrial production growth rate Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP Human development index Corruption (perceptions) index Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion   1.   Slovak Republic 90.00% (90.00%) Size 0% (0%) Percentage of population under 25 41% (41%) Population growth 25% (25%) Interest rates 9% (9%) Gross domestic product growth 90% (90%) Unemployment rate 12% (12%) Inflation rate 27% (27%) Wage growth rate 30% (30%) Foreign direct investment per capita 1% (1%) Number of universities per capita 44% (44%) Population density 2% (2%) Maximum attainable yield 17% (17%) Yield spread 11% (11%) Yield data strength 24% (24%) Average attainable yield 41% (41%) Entry level to market 53% (53%) GDP PPP per capita 38% (38%) Population below poverty line 0% (0%) Income distribution 82% (82%) Industrial production growth rate 100% (100%) Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP 83% (83%) Human development index 79% (79%) Corruption (perceptions) index 39% (39%) Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion 76% (76%)   2.   Colombia 84.41% (84.41%) Size 7% (7%) Percentage of population under 25 73% (73%) Population growth 58% (58%) Interest rates 3% (3%) Gross domestic product growth 56% (56%) Unemployment rate 7% (7%) Inflation rate 12% (12%) Wage growth rate 25% (25%) Foreign direct investment per capita 0% (0%) Number of universities per capita 11% (11%) Population density 1% (1%) Maximum attainable yield 34% (34%) Yield spread 3% (3%) Yield data strength 62% (62%) Average attainable yield 48% (48%) Entry level to market 95% (95%) GDP PPP per capita 13% (13%) Population below poverty line 0% (0%) Income distribution 11% (11%) Industrial production growth rate 57% (57%) Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP 84% (84%) Human development index 64% (64%) Corruption (perceptions) index 24% (24%) Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion 64% (64%)   3.   Egypt 76.88% (76.88%) Size 6% (6%) Percentage of population under 25 78% (78%) Population growth 65% (65%) Interest rates 3% (3%) Gross domestic product growth 57% (57%) Unemployment rate 10% (10%) Inflation rate 5% (5%) Wage growth rate 28% (28%) Foreign direct investment per capita 0% (0%) Number of universities per capita 2% (2%) Population density 1% (1%) Maximum attainable yield 33% (33%) Yield spread 3% (3%) Yield data strength 50% (50%) Average attainable yield 39% (39%) Entry level to market 66% (66%) GDP PPP per capita 9% (9%) Population below poverty line 0% (0%) Income distribution 49% (49%) Industrial production growth rate 46% (46%) Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP 85% (85%) Human development index 48% (48%) Corruption (perceptions) index 12% (12%) Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion 80% (80%)   4.   Belarus 73.63% (73.63%) Size 1% (1%) Percentage of population under 25 37% (37%) Population growth 11% (11%) Interest rates 3% (3%) Gross domestic product growth 68% (68%) Unemployment rate 87% (87%) Inflation rate 1% (1%) Wage growth rate 43% (43%) Foreign direct investment per capita 0% (0%) Number of universities per capita 6% (6%) Population density 1% (1%) Maximum attainable yield 35% (35%) Yield spread 0% (0%) Yield data strength 0% (0%) Average attainable yield 100% (100%) Entry level to market 80% (80%) GDP PPP per capita 0% (0%) Population below poverty line 0% (0%) Income distribution 65% (65%) Industrial production growth rate 33% (33%) Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP 0% (0%) Human development index 67% (67%) Corruption (perceptions) index 1% (1%) Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion 30% (30%)   5.   Vietnam 72.45% (72.45%) Size 2% (2%) Percentage of population under 25 72% (72%) Population growth 47% (47%) Interest rates 5% (5%) Gross domestic product growth 71% (71%) Unemployment rate 22% (22%) Inflation rate 7% (7%) Wage growth rate 17% (17%) Foreign direct investment per capita 0% (0%) Number of universities per capita 2% (2%) Population density 4% (4%) Maximum attainable yield 15% (15%) Yield spread 17% (17%) Yield data strength 3% (3%) Average attainable yield 37% (37%) Entry level to market 44% (44%) GDP PPP per capita 5% (5%) Population below poverty line 0% (0%) Income distribution 41% (41%) Industrial production growth rate 99% (99%) Current account balance as a percentage of GDP PPP 84% (84%) Human development index 53% (53%) Corruption (perceptions) index 8% (8%) Inverse proximity to Gaussian curve inflexion 84% (84%)   6.   Mexico 71.28% (71.28%) Size 12% (12%) Percentage of population under 25 74% (74%) Population growth 51% (51%) Interest rates 4% (4%) Gross domestic product growth 20% (20%) Unemployment rate 34% (34%) Inflation rate 18% (18%) Wage growth rate 5%